Month: February 2023

Response to Yizhou Zhang Blog Post #2

Hi Jason, great blog post #2 discussing the direct instruction approach. Your post was very informative, and improved my understanding of this learning method. It was interesting comparing the differences from the instructional approach I covered, open pedagogy. Notably, the involvement, structure, and engagement from educational professionals was the main difference I recognized of these approaches. I believe the direct instruction approach would be a beneficial teaching strategy for me, and learners that value detailed instructions/ feedback. I agree, students between kindergarten and grade 12 tend to require more in-depth teaching, therefore the direct instructions generally are a reliable strategy independently or combined with an alternative approach.

https://yizhouzhang.opened.ca/

Learning Design: Open Pedagogies

Defining open pedagogies was difficult, considering throughout previous decades the meaning and purpose of the term continuously changes. Wiley and Hilton’s (2018) article provides a variety of definitions such as ā€œā€œopenā€ pedagogies with the former tending to be more focused on didactic discussion and the latter being connected with leading less formal discussions and students co-creating the context of the class. Mai (1978) discusses open pedagogy in the context of creating an ā€œinformal classroom where children might be trusted to learn by exploring according to their own interests, instead of being bored, demeaned, and alienatedā€ (p. 231). Dufeu (1992) argues that open pedagogy is a philosophy in which the content of the course, as well as its progression, is determined by the needs and preferences of participants. Daniel (2004) refers to open pedagogy as one ā€œthat treats the student as an intellectual equalā€ (p.9)ā€ (p.134). Wiley and Hilton (2018) state open pedagogy is strongly associated with the term, open educational resources. Importantly, the significance for the ā€œopenā€ signals the copyright license permits public access to their 5Rs activity – retain, reuse, revise, remix, and redistribute (Clinton-Lisell, 2021). David Jeong from Learning Pod 1, wrote his Blog Post #2 on open pedagogies as well, and his comment regarding the advantages of having the open feature promotes a movement of diversity and empowerment among learners internationally. Unlike traditional notions of education, open pedagogy implements digital technologies as tools for course material (Clinton-Lisell, 2021). This online learning approach promotes an active, collaborative, and flexible learning experience. Importantly, a significant advantage of open pedagogy is how teachers develop and submit free resources for textbook alternatives, which reduces financial costs and student loans, making education more accessible globally (Clinton-Lisell, 2021).  

Ā  In relation to my group’s Learning Design Blueprint, we determined this method would not be the most effective form of evaluation. Our focus is teaching children in grades K- grade 3 about racism and monitoring their takeaways and growth mindset during each exercise. An academic resource claims ā€œevaluating the impacts of open pedagogy on student learning, student engagement, and other metrics of interest is essentially impossible,ā€ which is crucial information for our project, and confirms this approach does not align with our vision (Wiley & Hilton, 2018).

Clinton-Lisell, Virginia. “Open Pedagogy: A Systematic Review of Empirical Findings.” Journal of Learning for Development 8.2 (2021): 255-268.

DuFeu, B. (1992, January). Pour une pedagogie ouverte (For an Open Pedagogy). Francais dans le Monde, 246, 39-45.

Daniel, J. (2004). From the triangle to the pentagon: Open universities in the 21st century. Commonwealth of Learning, 2-9. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11599/1446

Wiley, David, and John Levi Hilton Iii. “Defining OER-enabled pedagogy.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 19.4 (2018).

Jeong David from Learning Pod 1. Blog Post #2: Learning Design. (2023)Ā 

Mai, R. P. (1978). Open education: From ideology to orthodoxy. Peabody Journal of Education, 55(3), 231-237. doi:10.1080/01619567809538192

© 2025 nicolecampbell

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑